-
Recent Posts
- Was Paul unconditionally called? Paul did not think so and here is why.
- Romans 9-11 Part 3: The hardening and blinding of national Israel
- Romans 9-11 Part 2: The Thriving of Arminianism
- Romans 9-11 Part 1: Paul’s Battering Ram Against Limiting Salvation
- An Arminian Analysis of Acts 13:48 as Covenant Transfer
Archives
- May 2019
- October 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- May 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- November 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
Categories
Meta
Tag Archives: Arminian free-will defended
Romans 9-11 Part 3: The hardening and blinding of national Israel
Romans 9–11 Part 3: The Hardening and Blinding of National Israel By StriderMTB How should we understand the hardening and blinding of Romans 11:7-8? Romans 9-11 Part 1 can be found here. Romans 9-11 Part 2 can be found … Continue reading
Posted in Critiquing Calvinism
Tagged arminian election and predestination, Arminian free-will defended, Calvinism, Calvinism and evil, Calvinism and sovereignty, Calvinism incoherence, Calvinism Inconsistency, Calvinism ordaining sin, Calvinism refuted, calvinism vs. arminianism, Christianity, Paul and Romans 9, Romans 9
4 Comments
The Folly of Doing Theology in an Echo Chamber: A Thorough Examination of Piper’s “Two-Wills of God” View
The Folly of Doing Theology in an Echo Chamber: A Thorough Examination of Piper’s “Two Wills of God” View By Strider MTB *Permission is freely granted to share this article in its entirety or in portions. My friends call me … Continue reading
Posted in Critiquing Calvinism
Tagged Arminian free-will defended, Biblical sovereignty, Calvinism, Calvinism and evil, Calvinism and sovereignty, Calvinism Inconsistency, Calvinism theodicy, calvinism vs. arminianism, Critiquing John Piper, Dark side of Calvinism, debate on Calvinism, Debating Arminian theology vs. Calvinism, debunking Calvinism, Does God have two wills?, God’s will of command and will of decree, John Piper, John Piper God has two wills, Rebutting John Piper’s two wills of God, Responding to John Piper’s God’s two wills, Why John Piper is wrong
21 Comments
A Critique of John Piper’s Theodicy: Are We God’s Evil Contract Assassins? Part 3
In my last post I ended saying that the key error of the Piper Theodicy is assuming that all acts—including all acts of moral evil are intended acts by the divine will via God’s exhaustive decrees. Rather than stop at the biblical … Continue reading
Posted in Critiquing Calvinism
Tagged Arminian free-will defended, Calvinism and evil, Calvinism debunked, calvinism vs. arminianism, Calvinism's Inconsistency, Critiquing John Piper Theology, Dark side of Calvinism, Debating Arminian theology vs. Calvinism, Debunking John Piper Calvinism, Defending free-will against Calvinism, Jonathan Edwards theology
30 Comments
Debate on Calvinistic Compatibilism Part 26: Matt replies–part 2
Hey Derek! I want to repeat my genuine affection for you as a fellow brother in the Lord. In my responses to you I do not want to sound haughty or superior and I certainly do not intend to disparage … Continue reading
Debate on Calvinistic Compatibilism Part 6: Matt Responds
Hi Derek, Thanks for the response. So you concede that you have never had a thought or desire that was not pre-determined by God? Remember you are trying to argue that compatibilism is fundamentally distinguished from hard determinism because it … Continue reading
Calvinism’s Engineered “Freedom”
In dealing with free-will the Calvinist skillfully maneuvers the discussion into a framework where he can give lip-service to “free-will,” but in doing so he mars the common sense, standard understanding “freedom” beyond any semblance of recognition. Let’s take sin’s … Continue reading
Posted in Critiquing Calvinism
Tagged Arminian free-will defended, Arminianism vs Calvinism, Calvinism Nonsense, Calvinism understanding of free-will, Calvinism understanding of freedom, debunking Calvinism free-will, defending free-will, Defending free-will against Calvinism, free-will, free-will understand defined, inconsistency of Calvinism
Leave a comment
