-
Recent Posts
Archives
- August 2021
- January 2021
- October 2020
- June 2019
- May 2019
- October 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- May 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- November 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
Categories
Meta
Tag Archives: Debating Arminian theology vs. Calvinism
Debate on Calvinistic Compatibilism Part 22: Matt Responds
Hey Derek! Sorry for the delay. Hope all is going well. This has been a good dialogue and I thank you. I will probably collect our responses from this comment section and post it up as its own blog entry … Continue reading
Debate on Calvinistic Compatibilism Part 21: Derek Responds
Matt, Very well done! You have identified an apparent hole in my argument which seems to show that I have either: A) misspoken/overstepped when I previously expressed something as if I was aware of it “from God’s standpoint;” or B) … Continue reading
Debate on Calvinistic Compatibilism Part 20: Matt Responds
Hey Derek, buddy… pal… You’re not wanting to give an actual answer to the 3 questions I posed because you intuitively know that from God’s decretive standpoint or perspective there are no genuine possibilities and there is no genuine freedom or … Continue reading
Debate on Calvinistic Compatibilism Part 19: Derek Responds
Matt, Thank you for these additional comments and questions. How is it possible you still aren’t persuaded? Well, to be honest, you are a great challenger and make excellent use of logic in your argumentation. In the interest of … Continue reading
Debate on Calvinistic Compatibilism Part 18: Matt Responds
Thank you, Derek, for the time and effort you have given to explain your personal view of compatibilism and seeking to demonstrate how it retains an authentic free-will. However… as you probably have guessed I have not found your arguments at … Continue reading
Matt, I believe you are stating the issues correctly. As requested, I am going to quote from your previous post and respond directly. This post will be an initial response to some of your preliminary comments and questions, and the … Continue reading
Debate on Calvinistic Compatibilism Part 16: Matt Responds
Hi Derek, I do concede that I have not covered or answered all the queries and comments you have submitted. I don’t have a problem with both of us being selective as long as we try to focus in on … Continue reading
Debate on Calvinistic Compatibilism Part 15: Derek Responds
Matt, Thank you for your response. You make some good points here. I probably have been too broad in summarizing your arguments. At this juncture, we seem to be advancing well into the subject matter, and I am going to … Continue reading
Debate on Calvinistic Compatibilism Post 14: Matt Responds
Hi Derek, I enjoy reading your responses However I feel you are summarizing my responses too much and doing so in a generalized manner that ignores key terms and allows you to bypass the thrust of some of my comments. It … Continue reading
Debate on Calvinistic Compatibilism Part 13: Derek Responds
Matt, This reply is well written, well argued, and very strongly stated. I am reeling with the force of it. Downright impressive, actually! Nevertheless, a few clarifications are in order, and I think I can escape the main thrust of … Continue reading
A Theology in Tension 